The disgraceful behaviour of this man is he hides behind Privilege to attack Kathy Jackson, then others who want to ruin his political career.  I say what career ?

He claimed he knew what the word Forensic meant, however as is his want, he failed to mention other uses of the word below

fo·ren·sic

adjective

  1. 1.            pertaining to, connected with, or used in courts of law… or public discussion and debate.
  2. 2.            adapted or suited to argumentation; rhetorical.
    noun
  3. 3.            forensics, ( used with a singular or plural verb ) the art or study of argumentation and formal debate.
1. forensic - of, relating to, or used in public debate or argument

  • rhetorical - given to rhetoric, emphasizing style at the expense of thought; “mere rhetorical frippery”
2. forensic - used or applied in the investigation and establishment of facts or evidence in a court of law; “forensic photograph”; “forensic ballistics”

  • applied - concerned with concrete problems or data rather than with fundamental principles; “applied physics”; “applied psychology”; “technical problems in medicine, engineering, economics and other applied disciplines”- Sidney Hook

 

We can see there is more than one use for the word Forensic.  A shame Thomson doesn’t source his own speeches, or maybe he does.

I don’t know what kind of Union Rep he was once, but we know what he is known for now, and he is certainly no prize as a MP either.

Mr Thomson made a claim at no time did FWA speak to him and yet on 15
September 2010 FWA did informally interview him in regard this matter see Chapter 3,  35.b on page 133 of the 28 March 2012 FWA Report on Investigations into HSU and Thomson. http://takebackaustralia.aussieblogs.com.au/files/2012/05/136447-fwa-report.pdf

Mr Thomson made the usual claims of receiving threats, yet never showed any indication he had given this to the police and sounds like the same type of threats the Climate scientists claimed to have received.  These were found to be lies used to try and demonise the enemy, and Thomson has tried to blame Abbott for these, it all sounds too familiar.

Thomson has accused the media of hiding outside the bathroom window while his wife was showering, again no indication this went to police, but he was able to use this for his poignant moment while he choked up (must have been to Gillard’s acting coach),  we already feel sorry for your wife Thomson, for she is involved with you.  Your acting does not impress us, and neither does your accusation against the Coalition,  YOU are responsible for ALL of this Mr Thomson and in the now famous words of Bill Kelty,  ” it’s too easy to blame the media, too easy to blame the playthings of politics. And there’s no purpose blaming the Opposition for doing what after all you would expect them to do and that’s to beat you. “

Your own words will beat you as your lies are sloppy Mr Thomson, they are not sustainable and I have been able to debunk 2 parts of your argument very easily above by using  the truth that Kelty refers to.  In essence I guess the Union is calling you a liar along with your boss, and if you get any real threats it will be from unionists, not from non unionists.  It is their money you have used, and their union’s reputation you have damaged. While they work 12 hour shifts for little money, you spend the equivalent on a 1 hour session with your ‘ Therapists’.

Thomson wants Surveillance photos to prove he wasn’t there, however, firstly if a brothel used a surveillance camera, no one would visit them, and secondly, there are no surveillance cameras if you used the escort service rather than in house.  Nice try Craigslist, but people aren’t stupid enough to get caught up in this spin.  The truth might be you are desperate to convince your wife this isn’t who you were and we ask when the last time anyone saw a Leopard change it’s spots.